Arbitration in India: Why It's Becoming the Preferred Way to Resolve Business Disputes
- shubhamtulsian05
- Jun 17
- 4 min read
A commercial dispute filed in an Indian civil court today can easily take 7 to 15 years to reach final resolution through trial and appeals. For businesses, this delay is often more damaging than the dispute itself — capital gets locked, relationships sour, and uncertainty paralyses decision-making. Arbitration has emerged as the preferred contractual mechanism for resolving business disputes precisely because it offers a faster, more confidential, and internationally enforceable alternative to court litigation.
What is Arbitration?
Arbitration is a private dispute resolution process where parties agree to submit their dispute to one or more arbitrators (instead of a court), whose decision — the arbitral award — is final and binding, with very limited grounds for court interference. It is governed in India by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, significantly amended in 2015, 2019, and 2021 to align Indian arbitration practice closer to international standards.
Why Businesses Choose Arbitration Over Litigation
Speed: Arbitration proceedings, especially under institutional rules, are typically designed to conclude within 12-18 months — compared to years or decades in regular civil courts.
Confidentiality: Court proceedings are public record. Arbitration proceedings and awards are confidential, protecting sensitive business information, trade secrets, and reputation.
Party autonomy: Parties can choose their arbitrator(s) — often industry experts with relevant technical or commercial knowledge, rather than a generalist judge.
Limited grounds for challenge: Under Section 34, an arbitral award can be challenged only on narrow grounds (incapacity, invalid agreement, lack of proper notice, award beyond scope of submission, or conflict with public policy) — not on the merits of the decision. This finality is a major advantage over multi-tier court appeals.
International enforceability: Arbitral awards from India are enforceable in over 160 countries under the New York Convention, 1958 — making arbitration the preferred mechanism for cross-border commercial contracts.
Key Provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
Section 7 — The Arbitration Agreement
An arbitration agreement must be in writing — either as a separate agreement or as a clause within a commercial contract. Most commercial contracts in India now include a standard arbitration clause specifying the seat of arbitration, the number of arbitrators, the governing rules (ad hoc or institutional), and the language of proceedings.
Section 9 — Interim Relief Before or During Arbitration
Parties can approach a court for interim measures (injunctions, asset preservation, appointment of a receiver) before arbitration commences or while it is pending — crucial where urgent protection of assets or evidence is needed before the arbitral tribunal is even constituted.
Section 11 — Appointment of Arbitrators
If parties cannot agree on an arbitrator, either party can approach the High Court (for domestic arbitrations) or Supreme Court (for international commercial arbitrations) for appointment. The 2015 Amendment significantly limited the scope of judicial scrutiny at this stage — courts now examine only the existence of a valid arbitration agreement, not the merits of the dispute.
Section 12(5) and the Fifth/Seventh Schedule — Independence and Impartiality
Following widespread concerns about arbitrators with conflicts of interest (particularly in cases where one party's employee or former employee acted as the sole arbitrator), the 2015 Amendment introduced strict disqualification criteria based on the IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest. An arbitrator falling within the Seventh Schedule categories is ineligible to act, regardless of party agreement to the contrary.
Section 29A — Time Limit for Awards
Domestic arbitral awards (excluding international commercial arbitration) must be made within 12 months of the tribunal's constitution, extendable by 6 months by consent of parties, and beyond that only by court order — introducing real time discipline into the process.
Section 34 — Challenging an Award
An award can be set aside only on the limited grounds specified — incapacity of a party, invalid arbitration agreement, lack of proper notice of proceedings, the award dealing with matters beyond the scope of submission, improper composition of the tribunal, or the award being in conflict with the 'public policy of India' (a ground narrowly interpreted post-amendment to exclude mere errors of law or fact).
Section 36 — Enforcement of Awards
A domestic arbitral award is enforceable as if it were a decree of a civil court. The 2015 and 2021 Amendments clarified that mere filing of a challenge under Section 34 does not automatically stay enforcement — the challenging party must specifically seek and obtain a stay, often conditional on deposit of the awarded amount.
Institutional vs Ad Hoc Arbitration
Institutional arbitration: Conducted under the rules of an established arbitral institution (such as the Mumbai Centre for International Arbitration, Delhi International Arbitration Centre, or international bodies like ICC and SIAC) which provides administrative support, appointed arbitrator panels, and procedural rules — generally more efficient and predictable.
Ad hoc arbitration: Conducted without institutional administration, with parties and arbitrators managing procedure themselves — more flexible but historically more prone to delay in India without strong institutional discipline.
Drafting an Effective Arbitration Clause
A well-drafted arbitration clause in your commercial contracts should specify: the seat of arbitration (which determines the supervisory court jurisdiction), the number of arbitrators (one or three), the appointing procedure if parties disagree, the governing rules (institutional or ad hoc), the language of proceedings, and whether interim relief can be sought from courts. Ambiguous or poorly drafted clauses are a leading cause of pre-arbitration litigation over the scope and validity of the clause itself.
How PGT & Associates Can Help
PGT & Associates assists businesses in drafting robust arbitration clauses for commercial contracts, represents clients in Section 9 interim relief applications, Section 11 arbitrator appointment petitions, and Section 34 challenge proceedings before the Gujarat High Court, and provides financial and accounting expert support during arbitral proceedings involving quantum of damages or valuation disputes. Contact us at +91-87994-99189 for guidance on structuring dispute resolution mechanisms in your business contracts.
Comments